India's Supreme Court
upholds anti-gay sex law
India's Supreme Court on
Wednesday struck down a 2009 lower court decision to decriminalize
homosexuality, dealing a blow to gay activists who have fought for years for
the chance to live openly in India's deeply conservative society.
The judges said only
lawmakers and not the courts could change a colonial-era law criminalizing
homosexuality.
The lesbian, gay,
bisexual and transgender community across India reacted to the surprise
decision with defiance.
"We cannot be
forced back into the closet. We are not backing off from our fight against
discrimination," said Gautam Bhan, an activist who had petitioned the
court.
After the ruling, dozens
of activists outside the court began crying and hugging each other in
consolation.
"This is a very sad
day for us, we are back to square one in our fight for the democratic rights of
the gay community," said Ashok Row Kavi of the activist group Humsafar
Trust.
Lawyers and supporters
of gays, lesbians and transsexuals vowed to continue pressing for the removal
of the law, which they say encourages discrimination, even if it is rarely
invoked by prosecutors.
"We feel very let
down," said lawyer Anand Grover, who had argued the case on behalf of the
advocacy group NAZ Foundation. "But our fight is not over and we will
continue to fight for the constitutional right."
He said the foundation
would ask for the Supreme Court's decision to be reviewed.
The law, dating back to
the 1860s, when Britain ruled over South Asia, states that "whoever
voluntarily has carnal intercourse against the order of nature with any man,
woman or animal" can be punished by up to 10 years in prison.
The 2009 New Delhi High
Court ruling, which said the law violated fundamental human rights, infuriated
conservatives and religious groups who say homosexuality represents a threat to
traditional Indian culture.
In a rare alliance, the
groups - including the All India Muslim Law Board, Christian groups and Hindu
spiritual leaders - argued that gay sex is unnatural and that India should
maintain the law.
Amod Kanth, head of the
Prayas organization for children's welfare, one of India's largest civic
groups, cheered Wednesday's ruling and said banning homosexuality is key to
ensuring children's normal development and protecting their rights to family.
"Only a man and a
woman constitute a family and contribute for the holistic development of a
child, which is not possible without a father and a mother," Kanth told
the Press Trust of India news agency.
Activists have long
argued that the law encourages discrimination and leaves gays, lesbians and
bisexuals vulnerable to police harassment or demands for bribes. In a country
where arranged marriage is still largely the norm, many gays hide their sexual
orientation from friends and relatives.
Acceptance is slowly
growing, though, particularly in big cities such as New Delhi and Mumbai. In
the last few years, activists have staged large gay pride parades featuring
rainbow-colored flags and banners, joyful songs and dancing through the
streets.
The government,
meanwhile, has begun acknowledging India's transgender - or hijra - community,
the origins of which go back millennia to a time when transsexuals, eunuchs and
gays held a special place in society backed by Hindu myths of their power to
grant fertility.
In 2009, the government
allowed them to register to vote as "others," rather than as men or
women. And in 2010, a new "third gender" category was added to the
national census.
Law Minister Kapil Sibal
said little about Wednesday's verdict beyond agreeing that the
"legislature is the final arbiter of what law should be."
If the issue comes up in
Parliament, he said, "we will take it up."

No comments:
Post a Comment