Execution Raises Doubts
About Kim’s Grip on North Korea
SEOUL,
South Korea — Perhaps one of the most intriguing details in North Korea’s
announcement of the execution of Jang Song-thaek, the uncle and presumed mentor
of the leader Kim Jong-un, was what its state-run media reported that Mr. Jang
said while confessing to plotting to overthrow Mr. Kim’s government.
“I was
going to stage the coup by using army officers who had close ties with me or by
mobilizing armed forces under the control of my confidants,” the North’s Korean
Central News Agency on Friday quoted Mr. Jang as having said on Thursday during
his court-martial. “I thought the army might join in the coup if the living of
the people and service personnel further deteriorate in the future.”
It could
not be independently confirmed whether Mr. Jang, long considered a champion of
a Chinese-style economic reform in North Korea, actually made such a statement
or whether the regime cooked up the assertion to justify his execution. But the
long list of crimes that Mr. Jang and his followers were accused of having
committed was tantamount to a highly unusual admission of what analysts said
could be a serious and bloody power struggle over economic and other policies
inside the impoverished but nuclear-armed country.
The speed
with which Mr. Kim — or whoever else was engineering Mr. Jang’s downfall —
hurried to execute him and make it public was a sign of instability and a lack
of confidence in Mr. Kim’s grip on power, the analysts said. Normally, North
Korea hides any signs of disloyalty to the Kim dynasty.
“If Kim
Jong-un was sure of his control of power, he would not have needed to execute
his uncle,” said Lee Byong-chul, senior fellow at the Institute for Peace and
Cooperation in Seoul. “There will be big and small bloody purges, and at a time
like this, desperate extremists may lash out. Pyongyang is no longer safe.”
North
Korea on Friday hinted at such purges by condemning “undesirable and alien
elements” in “important posts of the party and state,” in “ministries and
national institutions,” and in agencies dealing with foreign trade, as well as
Mr. Jang’s acquaintances in the military.
Mr. Jang,
67, was executed Thursday immediately after being convicted on treason charges,
North Korea said. Suh Sang-kee, a senior governing party lawmaker in Seoul,
quoted South Korean intelligence officials as saying that Mr. Jang was executed
by a machine-gun firing squad.
Long
thought to be the second most influential man in the North, Mr. Jang was the
most prominent North Korean purged and executed under Mr. Kim, who South Korean
officials said was resorting to “a reign of terror” to consolidate his power.
Mr. Jang was the husband of Kim Kyong-hee, a sister of Kim Jong-il, Mr. Kim’s
late father, who ruled the North before his son. The fate of Ms. Kim was not
known, though analysts say it would be unlikely for Kim Jong-un to harm a blood
relative.
“The way
they dealt with Jang Song-thaek was highly unusual and unprecedented in North
Korean history,” said the Unification Minister Ryoo Kilj-jae, South Korea’s top
North Korea policy maker. “We are watching the recent series of developments in
the North with a deep concern.”
The State
Department said Thursday that it could not verify the execution, but a deputy
spokeswoman, Marie Harf, said if it did happen, “this is another example of the
extreme brutality of the North Korean regime.”
Kim
Kwan-jin, the South’s defense minister, said that the South Korean military was
being extra vigilant as it feared that the North might attempt a military
provocation against the South to defuse what might be a domestic political
crisis.
“The
North Korean military may make a wrong decision for various reasons,” he said.
“There may be a competition within the military to show loyalty to Kim.”
Mr. Jang
had been a fixture in the North Korean elite for the past 40 years, serving in
major party posts under Kim Jong-il and gaining more power under his son, Kim
Jong-un. During a party meeting on Sunday, North Korea stripped Mr. Jang of all
his powerful posts and expelled him from the ruling Workers’ Party, calling him
an “anti-party, counterrevolutionary factional leader.” On Monday, state-run
television showed the spectacle of the once-powerful man being hauled off from
the party meeting by uniformed guards.

No comments:
Post a Comment