Thursday, October 31, 2013

George Zimmerman Juror: 'We All Know Who's Guilty'

George Zimmerman Juror: 'We All Know Who's Guilty'



One of the jurors in the George Zimmerman trial said her life was ruined by the case and that she has doubts about the jury's verdict.
The juror, who has been identified only as "Maddy," gave an interview to Inside Edition's Les Trent that airs on Thursday.
Shortly after the trial concluded, Maddy lost friends who were upset by the verdict and lost her job at a nursing home, according to an Inside Edition press released.
She said she and her husband have had to sell their possessions to make ends meet, including her kitchen table. The family now eats on the floor.
Maddy said she's now days away from having to move into a homeless shelter because she can't afford her house.
"Emotionally, mentally, physically, I’m so drained. I can’t stop thinking about the case," Maddy said in the release. "I have a heart. I got to hold the gun that killed this boy. I saw pictures I didn’t need to see.”
Maddy also told Trent she questions her reluctant decision to acquit Zimmerman of second-degree murder in the death of Trayvon Martin.
"We all know who’s guilty,” Maddy said. “George Zimmerman thinks he didn’t do anything wrong.”
Maddy previously told ABC's Robin Roberts that Zimmerman "got away with murder."
"... At the end of the day, he's going to have a lot of questions and answers he has to deal with. [But] the law couldn't prove it," Maddy told Roberts.
Maddy was the only minority on the six-person jury that acquitted Zimmerman in July.


Tuesday, October 29, 2013

McKinley Memorial Baptist Church Urged Help for Domestic Violence

McKinley Memorial Baptist Church Urged Help for Domestic Violence

The Willow Grove church featured an advocate for Norristown’s Laurel House in its Men’s Day service on Sunday in honor of National Domestic Violence Awareness Month.
patch
Marlon Millner, at the McKinley Memorial Baptist Church. Credit: Nicole Foulke



The McKinley Memorial Baptist Church in Willow Grove celebrated Men’s Day on Sunday, but services were also very much about women, as the congregation heard from an advocate from domestic violence agency Laurel House in Norristown, as well as pastor Marlon Millner, who also serves a Norristown councilman. 
Agnes Kiah, a legal advocate for Laurel House and a deacon at the Saints Memorial Baptist Church in Bryn Mawr, spoke about her own experience of domestic abuse.
According to Kiah, the man thought that he had slit her throat with a rusty blade, enough so to kill her, but he was wrong; he had cut her eyelid, instead. Kiah said that he continued to victimize and harass her while he was in jail. She fought to prevent his parole and was able to at points but eventually he was released. “He has now been out and since he has been out, he has violated his parole,” she said, solemnly.    
Kiah has been assisting Laurel House for 14 years. “It’s not as easy as you think to get out or get away,” she said.
According to Millner, whether he is wearing the hat of a religious leader or the hat of a councilman, he can help expose the pubic to these issues. “We have to create space for people to come forward,” he said.
Laurel House is a domestic violence organization assisting those in Montgomery county, according to their website. They have various programs, from their program that assists those fleeing from abuse, to their program that helps children to cope with the trauma of having been exposed to violence, according to the website.
According to Kiah, Laurel House is in need of donations for women and children in the shelter, as well as monetary donations. 

Arrests Made in "Craigslist Murder"




A Craigslist ad linked to several armed robberies lured a Southern California father and his son to a deadly encounter with two teenage gang members in South Los Angeles, LAPD investigators said Monday.
Ryan Roth, 17, and Markell Thomas, 18, were arrested late last week in connection with the fatal shooting of Rene Balbuena in the 9200 block of Gramercy Place near 92nd Street in South LA.
The 41-year-old father of two was in the area Oct. 19 responding to an ad for a $300 Samsung Galaxy that his son found on Craigslist.
Investigators said Balbuena ( pictured below ) texted the suspects – who are believed to have posted the ad – to let them know he was there and ready for the transaction, LAPD Detective Chris Barling said in a news conference Monday afternoon.
That’s when Thomas allegedly jumped in the backseat of Balbuena’s car and pointed a gun at the victim’s 15-year-old son, demanding property.
Balbuena stepped out the car and was shot multiple times in the torso, allegedly by Roth, who was waiting outside the car, Barling said. Balbuena’s son suffered a non-life threatening graze wound.

The pair ran and the murder weapon is still outstanding, Barling said.
Thomas was arrested Oct. 24; Roth was arrested the next day. They are both believed to be part of the same Inglewood Bloods gang.
"No one else is going to get hurt," Sandra Balbuena, the victim's 19-year-old daughter, said of her reaction to the arrests.
Tearfully, Sandra Balbuena expressed gratitude for the detectives who tracked down her father's alleged killers.
Investigators said the arrests came after they linked the slaying and attempted robbery (the suspects did not get any money from the Balbuenas) to at least seven stick-ups in the Baldwin Hills area. Those heists all involved the same Craigslist ad for a Samsung Galaxy smartphone and happened between Aug. 2 and Oct. 7, Barling said.
Thomas is believed to have been involved in all seven of those robberies, Barling said.
Both suspects were charged by the LA County District Attorney’s office Monday with one count each of murder, attempted murder, robbery with special circumstances and gang allegations. The 17-year-old was charged as an adult, Barling said.
Additional charges may be filed against Thomas, pending further investigation into other alleged Craigslist crimes, he said.

Monday, October 28, 2013

War-weary Iraqis scared to leave homes as violence reaches levels not seen since '08


War-weary Iraqis scared to leave homes as violence reaches levels not seen since '08



AP Photo/Hadi Mizban
A woman grieves for her sister, who died in a bombing, while inspecting the site of the car bomb attack in Baghdad, Iraq on Oct. 19, 2013.
BAGHDAD — The bloodiest year since 2008 has left many Iraqis terrified of leaving their homes for fear of being killed by bombs or kidnapped.  
A series of recent attacks have pushed the death toll for 2013 past the 7,000 mark, according to the casualty database Iraq Body Count.  It is the highest annual figure since Iraq was recovering from a sectarian civil war five years ago in the wake of the U.S.-led invasion to topple Saddam Hussein.
On Sunday alone, car bombings in Baghdad, an explosion at a market, and a suicide bomber assault on soldiers lining up for their pay in the north of the country killed at least 66 people
Advertise | AdChoices
Experts say the skyrocketing death toll is due to a "nasty combination" of the country's existing power struggle between religious factions and spillover from the civil war in neighboring Syria.
'We don't go out at night'"The explosions and assassinations happen all the time and we are afraid to even go out in public spaces such as crowded markets for fear of an explosion or harm," said Ashraf Jabbar Mirza, a 40-year-old father of three whose uncle was killed by armed men in 2010. "Now there is so much more violence."

AP Photo/ Karim Kadim
Baghdad municipality workers clear debris while citizens inspect the site of a car bomb attack in the Sha'ab neighborhood of Baghdad, Iraq, Sunday, Oct. 27, 2013.
The year's death toll reached 7,000 on Oct. 20 when a blast in a Baghdad cafe and several improvised explosive devices across the country killed at least 80 people, according to Iraq Body Count.  
The organization, which calculates its figures based on media reports, said there were at least a dozen violent deaths each day during the past two weeks 
According to Iraq Body Count, the year with the most violent civilian deaths in Iraq is 2006, when 29,287 people died. This dropped dramatically the next year to 9,929 deaths in 2007, and ultimately fell to a post-invasion low of 4,147 in 2011.  
Hazem Mohamed Ali Shaaban, a 38-year-old from Baghdad, said the continuous violence has had a huge effect on the way ordinary citizens live their lives.
"These days are very difficult. We don’t go out at night in fear of explosions and assassinations,” he said. “I do not expect things to improve with the bombings happening every day, especially now they are occurring near cafes where the youth frequent."
Madida Hassan, 43, has experienced the country's descent into lawlessness first hand.

Saad Shalash / Reuters
A boy cries during the funeral of his relative, who was killed in a bomb attack outside a cafe in Baghdad's Amil district on Oct. 20, 2013.
Hassan, who runs a humanitarian organization, says she was was kidnapped by armed men last year. She accepts she is more at risk because of her work but speaks defiantly of her perilous task.
"I continue to do my job despite the kidnappings that happened to me," she said. "I went back to work with full strength, not in fear of terrorism, no matter what happens."
Syria fanning sectarian issuesViolence in Iraq has been perpetrated by Shiite and Sunni Muslims before and after the U.S.-led invasion. But according to Jane Kinninmont, a senior research fellow of London-based think tank Chatham House’s Middle East program, this year is different because the flames of those sectarian tensions are being fanned by the worsening civil war in Syria.
"The two are neighboring countries and very closely linked,” she said. "Most people in Iraq have got families in both countries, and Iraqis from all sides of the sectarian divide have been fighting for both sides of the conflict: [Syrian President Bashar] Assad [an Alawite, which is a branch of Shiite Muslim] and his Sunni opposition. This is really adding to the sectarian tensions in Iraq."

Col. Jack Jacobs, author Michael Kamber and The Washington Post's Rajiv Chandrasekaran talk about the tenth anniversary of the Iraq War and whether it was worth it.
In Baghdad, Mirza agreed that outside influence is having a negative effect. He said that while "political differences are filling people with sectarian rage" within Iraq, the violence has been made worse by "interference from neighboring countries."
But while Syria is a major factor, Kinninmont said the root of the violence is the failure of Iraqi Shiites and Sunnis to come to a political compromise after the official U.S. withdrawal in 2011.
Shiites form more than 60 percent of Iraq’s population, but they were marginalized under Saddam's rule. Now the government is led by the Shiite-supported Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, and Kinninmont says many Sunnis feel persecuted by the administration's "wide net" of security and anti-terror laws.
"After the U.S. withdrawal it was up to the Iraqi government to come up with a political bargain which included all groups," Kinninmont said.
"Most Sunni Muslims are not involved in violence,” she said. "Sunnis were actually central in subduing militant groups [such as al Qaeda in Iraq]. But certainly right now it is the marginalized Sunnis who have more of an incentive to seek violence because many of them do not feel that they have a democratic prospect."
Hassan, like many Iraqis, said she feels frustrated at the tragic effect of this failure of political compromise.
"The lack of an agreement of the political groups leads to more instability and deaths or assassinations," she said. "If Iraqi politicians agreed, Sunnis and Shiites alike, we would achieve security."

One year after the U.S. military pullout, Iraq teeters between statehood and failure. NBC News' Jim Maceda reports.
'Cowardly acts of violence'For Iraqis, the future appears unclear.
Sami Mohammed al-Mashhadani's 24-year-old son was killed in a "terrorist attack" in Ameria on April 18.
"I cannot say anything except that these acts are cowardly acts of violence," the 56-year-old said. "The acts are increasing, and nobody knows what is our fate."

US kills two top leaders of terror group that attacked Kenya mall


US kills two top leaders of terror group that attacked Kenya mall


A senior U.S. military official has confirmed that a military drone attack Monday afternoon killed two top leaders of the al Qaeda-linked terror group that massacred civilians at a Nairobi, Kenya mall last month.
The official said that the attack on a single vehicle in southern Somalia had killed two leaders of al Shabaab, including its most important explosives expert, a man named Anta. The official did not identify the second man killed.

A car carrying the two leaders was struck by Hellfire missiles fired from a Predator, said the official, who contended that no one outside the vehicle was killed.
Earlier, witnesses told al Jazeera said the strike happened near the town of Jilib, about 70 miles north of al-Shabaab's former stronghold of Kismayo near the Kenyan border.
"It was after afternoon prayers between 1:30 p.m. and 2 p.m. when I heard a loud bang.  Just one big bang," a witness from Jilib told Al Jazeera. "I came to the scene shortly after. I saw two dead bodies. Then al-Shabaab fighters came to the  scene and took the bodies from the Suzuki vehicle. It was a drone strike." 
It's the second time in a month that U.S. forces have gone after the senior leadership of al-Shabaab.
On October 7, some 20 U.S. Navy SEALs launched an assault on the town of Barawe along the Indian Ocean shore, hoping to capture or kill Ikrima, in charge of the group's external operations, including the September attack on the Westgate Mall in Nairobi that killed at least 67 people.
The SEALs had to withdraw from the shoreline after being spotted by al-Shabaab fighters and taking heavy fire. U.S. officials told NBC News that the commander on the ground also saw large numbers of women and children near the compound. 

Obama admin. knew millions could not keep their health insurance


Obama admin. knew millions could not keep their health insurance



Larry Downing / Reuters
U.S. President Barack Obama walks out to deliver remarks alongside Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius in the Rose Garden of the White House in Washington, October 1, 2013.

President Obama repeatedly assured Americans that after the Affordable Care Act became law, people who liked their health insurance would be able to keep it. But millions of Americans are getting or are about to get cancellation letters for their health insurance under Obamacare, say experts, and the Obama administration has known that for at least three years.
Four sources deeply involved in the Affordable Care Act tell NBC NEWS that 50 to 75 percent of the 14 million consumers who buy their insurance individually can expect to receive a “cancellation” letter or the equivalent over the next year because their existing policies don’t meet the standards mandated by the new health care law. One expert predicts that number could reach as high as 80 percent. And all say that many of those forced to buy pricier new policies will experience “sticker shock.”  
None of this should come as a shock to the Obama administration. The law states that policies in effect as of March 23, 2010 will be “grandfathered,” meaning consumers can keep those policies even though they don’t meet requirements of the new health care law. But the Department of Health and Human Services then wrote regulations that narrowed that provision, by saying that if any part of a policy was significantly changed since that date -- the deductible, co-pay, or benefits, for example -- the policy would not be grandfathered.

Buried in Obamacare regulations from July 2010 is an estimate that because of normal turnover in the individual insurance market, “40 to 67 percent” of customers will not be able to keep their policy. And because many policies will have been changed since the key date, “the percentage of individual market policies losing grandfather status in a given year exceeds the 40 to 67 percent range.”  
That means the administration knew that more than 40 to 67 percent of those in the individual market would not be able to keep their plans, even if they liked them. 
Yet President Obama, who had promised in 2009, “if you like your health plan, you will be able to keep your health plan,” was still saying in 2012, “If [you] already have health insurance, you will keep your health insurance.”
“This says that when they made the promise, they knew half the people in this market outright couldn’t keep what they had and then they wrote the rules so that others couldn’t make it either,” said  Robert Laszewski, of Health Policy and Strategy Associates, a consultant who works for health industry firms. Laszewski estimates that 80 percent of those in the individual market will not be able to keep their current policies and will have to buy insurance that meets requirements of the new law, which generally requires a richer package of benefits than most policies today. 
The White House does not dispute that many in the individual market will lose their current coverage, but argues they will be offered better coverage in its place, and that many will get tax subsidies that would offset any increased costs.
“One of the main goals of the law is to ensure that people have insurance they can rely on – that doesn’t discriminate or charge more based on pre-existing conditions.  The consumers who are getting notices are in plans that do not provide all these protections – but in the vast majority of cases, those same insurers will automatically shift their enrollees to a plan that provides new consumer protections and, for nearly half of individual market enrollees, discounts through premium tax credits,” said White House spokesperson Jessica Santillo.
“Nothing in the Affordable Care Act forces people out of their health plans: The law allows plans that covered people at the time the law was enacted to continue to offer that same coverage to the same enrollees – nothing has changed and that coverage can continue into 2014,” she said.
Individual insurance plans with low premiums often lack basic benefits, such as prescription drug coverage, or carry high deductibles and out-of-pocket costs. The Affordable Care Act requires all companies to offer more benefits, such as mental health care, and also bars companies from denying coverage for preexisting conditions.
Today, White House spokesman Jay Carney was asked about the president’s promise that consumers would be able to keep their health care. “What the president said and what everybody said all along is that there are going to be changes brought about by the Affordable Care Act to create minimum standards of coverage, minimum services that every insurance plan has to provide,” Carney said. “So it's true that there are existing healthcare plans on the individual market that don't meet those minimum standards and therefore do not qualify for the Affordable Care Act.”

Courtesy of Heather Goldwater
Heather Goldwater, 38, of South Carolina, says that she received a letter from her insurer saying the company would no longer offer her plan, but hasn't yet received a follow-up letter with a comparable option.
Other experts said that most consumers in the individual market will not be able to keep their policies. Nancy Thompson, senior vice president of CBIZ Benefits, which helps companies manage their employee benefits, says numbers in this market are hard to pin down, but that data from states and carriers suggests “anywhere from 50 to 75 percent” of individual policy holders will get cancellation letters. Kansas Insurance Commissioner Sandy Praeger, who chairs the health committee of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners, says that estimate is “probably about right.” She added that a few states are asking insurance companies to cancel and replace policies, rather than just amend them, to avoid confusion.
A spokesman for America's Health Plans says there are no precise numbers on how many will receive cancellations letters or get notices that their current policies don’t meet ACA standards. In both cases, consumers will not be able to keep their current coverage.
Those getting the cancellation letters are often shocked and unhappy.
George Schwab, 62, of North Carolina, said he was "perfectly happy" with his plan from Blue Cross Blue Shield, which also insured his wife for a $228 monthly premium. But this past September, he was surprised to receive a letter saying his policy was no longer available. The "comparable" plan the insurance company offered him carried a $1,208 monthly premium and a $5,500 deductible.
And the best option he’s found on the exchange so far offered a 415 percent jump in premium, to $948 a month.
"The deductible is less," he said, "But the plan doesn't meet my needs. Its unaffordable."
"I'm sitting here looking at this, thinking we ought to just pay the fine and just get insurance when we're sick," Schwab added. "Everybody's worried about whether the website works or not, but that's fixable. That's just the tip of the iceberg. This stuff isn't fixable."

Heather Goldwater, 38, of South Carolina, is raising a new baby while running her own PR firm. She said she received a letter last July from Cigna, her insurance company, that said the company would no longer offer her individual plan, and promised to send a letter by October offering a comparable option. So far, she hasn't received anything.

"I'm completely overwhelmed with a six-month-old and a business,” said Goldwater. “The last thing I can do is spend hours poring over a website that isn't working, trying to wrap my head around this entire health care overhaul."
Goldwater said she supports the new law and is grateful for provisions helping folks like her with pre-existing conditions, but she worries she won’t be able to afford the new insurance, which is expected to cost more because it has more benefits. "I'm jealous of people who have really good health insurance," she said. "It's people like me who are stuck in the middle who are going to get screwed."

Richard Helgren, a Lansing, Mich., retiree, said he was “irate” when he received a letter informing him that his wife Amy's $559 a month health plan was being changed because of the law. The plan the insurer offered raised his deductible from $0 to $2,500, and the company gave him 17 days to decide.
The higher costs spooked him and his wife, who have painstakingly planned for their retirement years. "Every dollar we didn't plan for erodes our standard of living," Helgren said.
Ulltimately, though Helgren opted not to shop through the ACA exchanges, he was able to apply for a good plan with a slightly lower premium through an insurance agent.
He said he never believed President Obama’s promise that people would be able to keep their current plans.
"I heard him only about a thousand times," he said. "I didn't believe him when he said it though because there was just no way that was going to happen. They wrote the regulations so strictly that none of the old polices can grandfather."
For months, Laszewski has warned that some consumers will face sticker shock. He recently got his own notice that he and his wife cannot keep their current policy, which he described as one of the best, so-called "Cadillac" plans offered for 2013. Now, he said, the best comparable plan he found for 2014 has a smaller doctor network, larger out-of-pocket costs, and a 66 percent premium increase.
“Mr. President, I like the coverage I have," Laszweski said. "It is the best health insurance policy you can buy."

Friday, October 25, 2013

JonBenet Ramsey Indictment Released (UPDATE)


JonBenet Ramsey Indictment Released (UPDATE)

DENVER -- DENVER (AP) — Grand jurors who reviewed evidence in the death of 6-year-old JonBenet Ramsey indicted both of her parents for child abuse resulting in death and being an accessory to a crime, including first-degree murder, according to documents released Friday.
The Daily Camera reported earlier this year that the grand jury had issued an indictment, but the documents for the first time revealed the charges against the Ramseys. The grand jury accused both John and Patsy Ramsey of helping someone who committed murder, but the document did not identify the alleged killer. The documents alleged both parents intended to delay or prevent the arrest of the alleged killer.
The district attorney at the time, Alex Hunter, who presented the evidence to the grand jury, declined to pursue charges saying: "I and my prosecutorial team believe we do not have sufficient evidence to warrant the filing of charges against anyone who has been investigated at this time."
Only pages that had been signed by the grand jury foreman and were considered official action of the jury were released. The numbering of the charges implies that there were other charges the jurors considered but rejected.
Hunter did not return a phone message left Thursday by The Associated Press in anticipation of the documents' release.
The grand jury met three years after the beauty queen's body was found bludgeoned and strangled in their home in Boulder on Dec. 26, 1996. The indictments alleged the crimes occurred between Dec. 25 and Dec. 26.
The Ramseys maintained their innocence, offering a $100,000 reward for the killer and mounting a newspaper campaign seeking evidence.
Former prosecutor and law professor Karen Steinhauser said grand juries sometimes hear evidence that won't be admitted during trial that can form the basis of indictments. But she added that prosecutors must have a good faith belief that they could prove a case beyond a reasonable doubt before pursuing charges.
"I'm not sure that the release of this indictment is going to change the fact that there has not been able to be a prosecution and probably won't be able to be a prosecution," she said.
Lurid details of the crime and striking videos of the child in adult makeup and costumes performing in pageants propelled the case into one of the highest profile mysteries in the United States in the mid-1990s. It also raised questions about putting children on display in beauty contests long before the popularity of reality shows such as "Toddlers & Tiaras" and "Here Comes Honey Boo Boo," which features moms and their child beauty pageant contestants.
Patsy Ramsey died of cancer in 2006, the same year a globe-hopping school teacher was arrested in Thailand after falsely claiming to have killed JonBenet. Former District Attorney Mary Lacy cleared the Ramseys in 2008 based on new DNA testing that suggested the killer was a stranger, not a family member.
Lacy did not return a phone call.
Over the years, some experts have suggested that investigators botched the case so thoroughly that it might never be solved.
Boulder Police Chief Mark Beckner said the case remains open but it's not an active investigation. He predicted the indictment's release wouldn't change anything.
"Given the publicity that's been out there, many people have formed their opinions one way or another," he said.
Earlier this week, John Ramsey asked officials to release the entire grand jury record if the unprosecuted indictment was made public. However, the judge said transcripts of grand jury proceedings and evidence presented to it are not considered "official action" under the law governing criminal court records. He also said releasing such information could hurt other grand juries, whose work is secret.
An attorney representing John Ramsey, L. Lin Wood, has said he's confident that no evidence in the grand jury case implicated the Ramsey family and the public should be able to see that for themselves.

Wednesday, October 23, 2013

Apple IPad Debut Shows No Fear of Rivals’ Lower Prices

Apple IPad Debut Shows No Fear of Rivals’ Lower Prices



Apple Inc. CEO Tim Cook

Apple Inc. (AAPL:US) isn’t acting worried about competition for the iPad.
Even as rivals such as Amazon.com Inc. (AMZN:US), Samsung Electronics Co. andGoogle Inc. (GOOG:US) introduce tablets at cheaper prices, Apple Chief Executive Officer Tim Cook went in the opposite direction yesterday. He unveiled a new iPad mini with a high-definition screen that starts at $399, $70 more expensive than last year’s model. Apple also introduced a lighter and thinner design for its larger tablet, renamed iPad Air, starting at the same price of $499.
The new iPads follow the debut of the iPhone 5c last month at a heftier price than analysts expected, underscoring how Apple is appealing to the higher end of the market where more profit is made. The Cupertino, California-based company is betting customers see its products as a unique mix of hardware, software and services that are more valuable than lower-cost alternatives.
“You can see from the pricing decision that Apple doesn’t really fear much competition,” said Benedict Evans, an analyst at Enders Analysis, who attended Apple’s event in downtown San Francisco yesterday.
Apple’s top marketing executive, Phil Schiller, said the company sees the tablet market bifurcating. On one end, Apple is focused on delivering high-quality devices, while the other has lower-quality devices and faces more pricing pressure, he said.
Schiller added that the iPad mini’s increased price is mainly the result of steeper costs for the new high-definition screens. Apple also dropped the price of last year’s iPad mini model to $299.

Crowded Market

Apple’s new iPads, which will be shipped next month, are debuting in a crowded market where companies including Samsung, Asustek Computer Inc., Google and Amazon have unveiled tablets, often at lower prices. The competition ramps up pressure on Apple because the iPad is its second-largest revenue source after its flagship iPhone. Success of the new models is critical as the company attempts to reignite revenue growth, which has slowed.
Apple’s new iPads, which also include more powerful processors and faster wireless speeds, are part of a broad product update ahead of the lucrative holiday shopping season. The company released the new iPhone 5s and 5c last month.
“We couldn’t be more pleased to introduce all of them to you in time for the holidays,” said Cook.

Many Macs

Apple also announced that it will for the first time start giving away its Mac software for free, starting with the latest release called Mavericks that was available for download yesterday. Apple’s productivity software, including iPhoto, iMovie and Pages, also are being made available for free. And the company showed an updated high-end Mac Pro desktop computer aimed at professions that need extra computing power, as well as new MacBook Pro laptops.
“Last month was all iPhone and this was everything else,” Carl Howe, an analyst with Yankee Group, said after the event.
Apple shares fell less than 1 percent yesterday to close at $519.87 in New York, leaving the stock down 2.3 percent for the year, compared with a 23 percent increase in the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index.
Apple’s challenge with the iPad is similar to what it faces with the iPhone. Rivals are introducing devices based on Google’s Android software that are cheaper.
Samsung, Asustek, Lenovo Group Ltd., Acer Inc. and others are offering tablets with prices starting at less than half of the iPad mini’s previous starting cost of $329. Amazon.com introduced new Kindle Fires last month with higher-resolution screens at prices starting from $229, while Microsoft Corp. and Nokia Oyj took the wraps off new tablets this week.

Falling Share

Amid the competition, Apple’s tablet market share slid to 32 percent in the second quarter, compared to 60 percent a year earlier, according to IDC.
In addition, more than three years after Steve Jobs unveiled the iPad, the growth of the global tablet market is showing signs of decelerating. Tablet shipments are projected to increase 28 percent in 2014 to 301 million units, after doubling in 2012, according to Counterpoint Research. Apple for the first time sold fewer iPads last quarter than it had in the year earlier period.
Cook alluded to the competition yesterday, noting “everybody seems to be making a tablet.”